Illusion of Global Fraternity [Part 1]

The initial path steems from the root assumption that the “ideal” is a sublimation of interaction between human kind and the material environment. Civilizations and cultures were born from this proper interactions. At a fruther stage, the interactions between civilizations gave birth to dominations and slavery. Taking the initial phase as a starting point, the identity of each communities were forged from material interactions. Hence the whole idea of wars amongst nations stems from war of “material experience” . Would this justify the claimed fraternity of civilizations ? The answer would be negative for the identity could never be united. The essence of particularity in the identity could only accept the other through contempt of its essence. The whole idea of global fraternity would only be a social subsidy for the economical concept of the market. A european would never accept an asian on an equal footing for it would blur his own unicness.